| 1 | | yes the backtick handling in musl is not so nice |
| | 1 | ~~yes the backtick handling in musl is not so nice~~ |
| | 2 | |
| | 3 | eh forget about my previous comment that was completely off the mark. |
| | 4 | |
| | 5 | MUSL does the same thing as FreeBSD, NetBSD, DragonflyBSD which is doing the whole thing with `sh` - so you're right, this does not look like a good way forward. |
| | 6 | |
| | 7 | This leaves us with either the current situation (no wordexp) or adapt from glibc which does seem to have a more proper implementation. (calling out to shell only for the backticks and dollar-parentheses) |
