Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of Ticket #19253, comment 5


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 15, 2024, 8:36:30 PM (5 weeks ago)
Author:
bipolar

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #19253, comment 5

    v3 v4  
    1 I *think* the issue lies in the way `MountArchivedVisitor` calculates a "score" for each partition, to decide if it should auto-mount it. In `MountArchivedVisitor::_Score(BPartition partition)`:
     1I ''think'' the issue lies in the way `MountArchivedVisitor` calculates a "score" for each partition, to decide if it should auto-mount it. In `MountArchivedVisitor::_Score(BPartition partition)`:
    22
    33It assigns +4 "score points" if the `capacity` of a given partition matches the value stored on the `info` BMessage from the settings.
    44
    5 It then assigns ~+3 points if the deviceName matches.~ +1 if fsName matches, and +1 if blockSize matches. (`deviceName` won't match for partitions on the same disk, but can cause issues if you change driver order on BIOS or when switching from VM to bare-metal).
     5It then assigns ~~+3 points if the deviceName matches.~~ +1 if fsName matches, and +1 if blockSize matches. (`deviceName` won't match for partitions on the same disk, but can cause issues if you change driver order on BIOS or when switching from VM to bare-metal).
    66
    77If I'm reading things right, a "score" value >= 6 means the partition gets auto-mounted.
    88
    9 In my case, "Haiku32" and "Haiku64" have the exact same capacity, ~and they are on the same device~ and are BFS formated, with same block size, thus they will get always auto-mounted together. Same with my "Data1"/"Data2" and "Temp1"/"Temp2" partitions.
     9In my case, "Haiku32" and "Haiku64" have the exact same capacity, ~~and they are on the same device~~ and are BFS formated, with same block size, thus they will get always auto-mounted together. Same with my "Data1"/"Data2" and "Temp1"/"Temp2" partitions.
    1010
    1111----