Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #2864, comment 5


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 15, 2010, 5:37:27 PM (14 years ago)
Author:
davidsaunders

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #2864, comment 5

    initial v1  
    11Replying to [comment:4 stippi]:
    2 > Users can actually make icons overlap themselves. So even while Tracker can figure out if a mounted volume overlaps another icon, it can't be sure this is how the user actually configured it. In strict spatial mode, Tracker should never override user configured placement. I believe this should be fixed differently: Introduce an icon placement mode where the user can arrange icons on a grid only and never so that they overlap. If this mode is preferred by everyone, the current mode could then be competely replaced by it.
     2> Users can actually make icons overlap themselves. So even while Tracker can figure out if a mounted volume overlaps another icon, it can't be sure this is how the user actually configured it.
    33
    4 I have actualy noticed that the stored position is not always the position at witch the icon of a mounted disk is placed,  especialy if you are using significantly different versions of Open Tracker (though this does also some times happen using only the same version)
     4I have actualy noticed that the stored position is not always the position at witch the icon of a mounted disk is placed,  especialy if you are using significantly different versions of Open Tracker (though this does also some times happen using only the same version).
     5
     6The Tracker code is to big and convaluted for me to learn quickly enough to be able to figure out what is causing this.