Changes between Version 11 and Version 12 of Obsolete/MovedToTree/PackageManagement/OldIdeas


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 5, 2009 3:53:14 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
Blub
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Obsolete/MovedToTree/PackageManagement/OldIdeas

    v11 v12  
    171171#!div style="background-color: #EEEEEE; border: 1px solid; margin: 20pt; padding: 5pt;"
    172172'''brecht''': I don't have a detailed view of pacman yet, but as far as I can see it is very similar to your average Linux package manager. As we want software management to be fundamentally different from the way Linux distributions handle it (because it simply is not a very elegant solution), I don't think pacman is a good choice.
     173
     174'''Blub''': Let me clarify: I was not suggesting to use 'pacman' as a package manager, I was just thinking that its library could be a useful codebase for a package-database, to keep track of dependencies, available packages and updates. It 'could' be used to unpack/install packages into a 'specified' folder, like /boot/apps (and even install dependencies into the same folder if wanted), or, it could just as well be used to simply keep track of where which package has been installed to without worrying about the actual contents.[[BR]]
     175Although when stripping the code to unpack the archives and keeping track of their files it is indeed better to create something new.[[BR]]
    173176}}}
    174177