Opened 11 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#10065 closed bug (fixed)
Jam clean fails
Reported by: | jscipione | Owned by: | bonefish |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | R1/beta4 |
Component: | Build System | Version: | R1/Development |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Platform: | All |
Description
On hrev46175, run jam clean, lots of .o files listed then:
...failed Clean clean ... BUILD FAILURE: ...failed updating 1 target(s)...
Change History (13)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
hmmm, could be an OS X problem or just something on my machine, jam is Jam 2.5-haiku-20111222. OS=MACOSX. Copyright 1993-2002 Christopher Seiwald.
Any ideas on how to troubleshoot?
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
The reason is the recently increased MAXLINE constant in Jam. It defines the maximum length of command lines jam produces. If it is greater than what your system (shell/libc/kernel) actually supports, jam may produce a command line that cannot be executed (correctly).
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
sysctl kern.argmax kern.argmax: 262144
so looks like it is 256k, which from what I've read is standard for BSD systems. Could this be the problem?
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
Since the jam version string hasn't been updated consequently upon changes in jam, I don't know what jam version you're actually using. I believe MAXLINE
has never been > 262144, so your kernel setting should suffice. You could just reduce MAXLINE
and see, if that improves the situation.
comment:6 by , 11 years ago
I was hoping the changes in hrev46194 would fix this problem but unfortunately jam clean still fails for me in the same way. Reducing MAXLINE didn't seem to help either.
comment:7 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → no change required |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
jam clean works now on OS X 10.9 Mavericks
comment:8 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | no change required |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Version: | R1/alpha4.1 → R1/Development |
This is actually still an issue. (one I see quite often)
The issue is due to the lack of a libroot_build.so and the usage of rm_attrs to erase files on clean. There is a situation that can exist where libroot_build.so is missing, thus rm_attrs fails to execute...
Clean clean Clean clean /home/kallisti5/Code/haiku/generated.arm/objects/linux/x86_64/release/tools/rm_attrs: error while loading shared libraries: libroot_build.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/home/kallisti5/Code/haiku/generated.arm/objects/linux/lib ; /home/kallisti5/Code/haiku/build/scripts/rm_attrs /home/kallisti5/Code/haiku/generated.arm/objects/linux/x86_64/release/tools/rm_attrs -f "/home/kallisti5/Code/haiku/generated.arm/objects/haiku/arm/release/system/libroot/posix/string/bzero.o" "/home/kallisti5/Code/haiku/generated.arm/objects/haiku/arm/release/system/libroot/posix/string/ffs.o" "/home/kallisti5/Code/haiku/generated.arm/objects/haiku/arm/release/system/libroot/posix/string/memccpy.o" "/home/kallisti5/Code/haiku/generated.arm/objects/haiku/arm/release/system/libroot/posix/string/memchr.o"...
I think the solution is to check for the existence of generated.arm/objects/linux/lib/libroot_build.so before attempting to use rm_attrs. Maybe if libroot_build.so is missing, the clean will attempt to build it.. or just fall back to rm vs rm_attrs.
The change needs to occur in build/jam/BuildSetup ~line 530.
We know the directory where libroot_build.so *should* be (HOST_BUILD_COMPATIBILITY_LIB_DIR), before setting RM to rm_attrs... we should check for libroot_build.so first, and fall back to rm if needed.
comment:9 by , 11 years ago
An interesting question is how libroot_build.so can be missing while rm_attr -- which depends on the former -- exists.
Anyway, I would recommend adjusting build/scripts/rm_attrs to simply fall back to using rm when invoking rm_attrs fails. I probably won't have time/motivation anytime soon, so whoever feels inclined to do that, please go ahead.
comment:10 by , 7 years ago
Milestone: | R1 → Unscheduled |
---|
comment:11 by , 3 years ago
An interesting question is how libroot_build.so can be missing while rm_attr -- which depends on the former -- exists.
That's not surprising during a "jam clean", however, since the goal is to remove all generated things, including tools that run on the host.
Can we make "jam clean" just delete generated/objects instead of what it is doing now? That would be simpler and more reliable. As we do out-of-tree builds, there is no need to individually track each generated file.
comment:12 by , 2 years ago
Just linking it for reference...
Proposed fix by Dominic: https://review.haiku-os.org/c/haiku/+/5313
comment:13 by , 2 years ago
Milestone: | Unscheduled → R1/beta4 |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | reopened → closed |
Not reproducible here.