Opened 10 years ago

Last modified 6 years ago

#10420 closed enhancement

3dfx ati neomagic s3 missing in x86_64 builds — at Version 9

Reported by: vidrep Owned by: nobody
Priority: normal Milestone: Unscheduled
Component: Drivers/Graphics Version: R1/Development
Keywords: Cc:
Blocked By: Blocking:
Platform: All

Description (last modified by umccullough)

3dfx ati neomagic s3 are missing from the x86_64 images due to pointer size issues

Change History (11)

by vidrep, 10 years ago

Attachment: listdev added

by vidrep, 10 years ago

Attachment: syslog1 added

comment:1 by vidrep, 10 years ago

Confirmed hrev46791_x86_64 Intel Extreme driver is working at 1920x1080 resolution. Nvidia and Ati/AMD cards still using 4:3 VESA modes.

Last edited 10 years ago by vidrep (previous) (diff)

comment:2 by kallisti5, 10 years ago

Summary: Only VESA 4:3 video support in x86_64 buildsnivida and radeon_hd drivers missing in x86_64 builds

renaming issue, 4:3 really has nothing to do with this issue.

comment:3 by kallisti5, 10 years ago

Summary: nivida and radeon_hd drivers missing in x86_64 buildsnvida and radeon_hd drivers missing in x86_64 builds

comment:4 by kallisti5, 10 years ago

Owner: changed from nobody to kallisti5
Status: newassigned

comment:5 by kallisti5, 10 years ago

Description: modified (diff)
Summary: nvida and radeon_hd drivers missing in x86_64 builds3dfx ati neomagic s3 missing in x86_64 builds
Type: bugenhancement

added a bunch of cards into hrev46794.

The only video drivers missing from x86_64 now are 3dfx ati neomagic s3. If you have issues with the added drivers, please open new issues for each one. Transforming this issue to "3dfx ati neomagic s3 missing from x86_64"

comment:6 by kallisti5, 10 years ago

Owner: changed from kallisti5 to nobody

comment:7 by umccullough, 10 years ago

I'm not sure it makes sense to add drivers for cards that were made that long ago (3dfx, s3, etc.) - I seriously doubt anyone who plans to run a 64bit Haiku will still be using those cards - especially since some of them probably pre-date 64bit CPUs ;)

comment:8 by umccullough, 10 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

Also, probably not a great idea to adjust the summary/description as you partially fix the issue - it severely reduces the readability of the ticket later on.

There's a "strikethrough" feature you could use in the description text though to represent pieces that are no longer broken.

comment:9 by umccullough, 10 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

bah, and now i've made a mess, sorry

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.