Opened 7 years ago

Closed 4 years ago

#13536 closed bug (fixed)

Monitor complains with message: "Input Not Supported" with an Intel i965Q

Reported by: CodeforEvolution Owned by: pulkomandy
Priority: normal Milestone: R1/beta2
Component: Drivers/Graphics/intel_extreme/9xx Version: R1/Development
Keywords: Cc:
Blocked By: Blocking:
Platform: All

Description

Hello! I am having a problem where my monitor will complain with a message saying "Input Not Supported" even though Haiku still runs like normal behind the hovering message. I am running hrev 51185 and unfortunately, I can't remember in which hrev the problem started. I'm running an Intel i965Q which makes use of the intel_extreme driver. Something to point out is that all the modes to use in the Screen prefs does not work, except the default configuration on boot.

Attachments (2)

syslog (112.2 KB ) - added by CodeforEvolution 7 years ago.
Haiku hrev51185 syslog
syslog.2 (227.5 KB ) - added by CodeforEvolution 7 years ago.
Haiku Alpha 4.1 Syslog

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (29)

by CodeforEvolution, 7 years ago

Attachment: syslog added

Haiku hrev51185 syslog

comment:1 by CodeforEvolution, 7 years ago

patch: 01

comment:2 by CodeforEvolution, 7 years ago

Don't know why it says "patch set".

comment:3 by pulkomandy, 7 years ago

patch: 10

comment:4 by pulkomandy, 7 years ago

A syslog from alpha4.1 (if you can't find anything more recent that still doesn't show the bug) and/or the output from "intel_reg dump" on Linux could help seeing what changed.

As for the "patch set" thing, it is a bug in Trac since the latest update.

comment:5 by diver, 7 years ago

Component: DriversDrivers/Graphics/intel_extreme
Owner: changed from nobody to kallisti5

by CodeforEvolution, 7 years ago

Attachment: syslog.2 added

Haiku Alpha 4.1 Syslog

comment:6 by CodeforEvolution, 7 years ago

patch: 01

comment:7 by CodeforEvolution, 7 years ago

Here is the log for Haiku Alpha 4.1 Interesting enough, it works without showing the "Input Not Supported" Message, and all the proposed dispaly modes, frequencies, and Color amount options work. (Except two very low resolution options at the 640x* range)

Last edited 7 years ago by CodeforEvolution (previous) (diff)

comment:8 by pulkomandy, 7 years ago

Alpha4.1:

1896	KERN: intel_extreme : hardware mode will actually be 1024x768
1897	KERN: PLL limits, min: p 5 (p1 1, p2 10), n 5, m 70 (m1 12, m2 7)
1898	KERN: PLL limits, max: p 80 (p1 8, p2 5), n 10, m 120 (m1 22, m2 11)
1899	KERN: required MHz: 65
1900	KERN: found: 65.1429 MHz, p = 28 (p1 = 2, p2 = 14), n = 6, m = 114 (m1 = 21, m2 = 9)
1901	KERN: PLL limits, min: p 5 (p1 1, p2 10), n 5, m 70 (m1 12, m2 7)
1902	KERN: PLL limits, max: p 80 (p1 8, p2 5), n 10, m 120 (m1 22, m2 11)
1903	KERN: required MHz: 65
1904	KERN: found: 65.28 MHz, p = 30 (p1 = 3, p2 = 10), n = 5, m = 102 (m1 = 19, m2 = 7)

Strange thing: why does it perform the search twice, and why does it not find the same result for the same input?

Nightly:

KERN: intel_extreme: SetDisplayMode: Analog A 1024x768
174	KERN: intel_extreme: compute_dpll_9xx: required MHz: 65
175	KERN: intel_extreme: PLL limits, min: p 5 (p1 1, p2 10), n 5, m 70 (m1 12, m2 7)
176	KERN: intel_extreme: PLL limits, max: p 80 (p1 8, p2 5), n 10, m 120 (m1 22, m2 11)
177	KERN: intel_extreme: compute_dpll_9xx: best MHz: 65.28 (error: 0.28)
178	KERN: intel_extreme: compute_pll_divisors: found: p = 30 (p1 = 3, p2 = 10), n = 5, m = 102 (m1 = 16, m2 = 10)

It finds the same timing as alpha4 second try, but with a different setting for the M1/M2 values. Maybe it results in a less stable clock, which your monitor then complains about? And why does it not pick the better solution at 65.1429MHz?

comment:9 by CodeforEvolution, 7 years ago

One thing I noticed when searching through the source code was that in the alpha, the pll calculation was done in the same source code file as the mode switcher, while in the nightlies, a whole separate source code file houses the pll calculation.

comment:10 by pulkomandy, 7 years ago

patch: 10

comment:11 by pulkomandy, 7 years ago

patch: 0

In the current driver, the PLL calculation handles several more generations of intel devices, each having different constraints on acceptable PLL values. This makes the PLL code somewhat more complex and this is why it was moved to a different file to keep things clear.

comment:12 by pulkomandy, 6 years ago

Milestone: UnscheduledR1/beta2

comment:13 by waddlesplash, 5 years ago

patch: 0

Please retest after hrev53040.

comment:14 by CodeforEvolution, 5 years ago

Well, the boot splash is showing again. However, after the boot splash completes, the screen remains black. I believe Haiku is still running in the background as the shutdown button still seems to work, with a little delay (while Haiku closes all applications assumably) and disk activity occurring before the computer completely turns off.

comment:15 by CodeforEvolution, 5 years ago

I can confirm that Haiku works as normal after blacklisting the intel_extreme driver. I still need to find a way to get a syslog to see what the intel_extreme driver was trying todo. The issue is I'm currently only using Haiku on a usb flash drive with the "livecd" image.

comment:16 by pulkomandy, 5 years ago

Component: Drivers/Graphics/intel_extremeDrivers/Graphics/intel_extreme/9xx
Owner: changed from kallisti5 to pulkomandy

comment:17 by CodeforEvolution, 5 years ago

Update: The intel_extreme driver at least works now...though still shows the “Input Not Supported” message on the monitor. I have been very busy unfortunately and have not had the time to grab a syslog, though hopefully this weekend I’ll finally get around to doing that.

comment:18 by pulkomandy, 5 years ago

I found various issues in the PLL computations. It would be great if you could try https://review.haiku-os.org/c/haiku/+/1898 and https://review.haiku-os.org/c/haiku/+/1902 (ideally, try each separately, then both patches applied together, with syslogs in each case)

comment:19 by pulkomandy, 5 years ago

Status: newin-progress

comment:20 by CodeforEvolution, 5 years ago

Hey, sorry for the delay on the feedback, my desktop I'm trying to test is only booting from minimal images on a CD (not even from a USB 2.0 flash drive) which doesn't include the intel_extreme driver. Is there a way to add extra files to a minimal image?

comment:21 by pulkomandy, 5 years ago

Use the nightly image instead of the minimal one? It already includes the driver.

comment:22 by CodeforEvolution, 5 years ago

Well, that was the issue, I can't get the nightly image to run on my computer. My computer's CD-ROM drive has a tendency to rapidly and randomly open and close its disc tray (this also occurs when the computer is running Linux). I do have a USB CD-ROM drive, and that was able to do a successful start up for the minimal image only for some reason. (For a nightly image, the drive spins down after the 4th icon on the boot screen and then the syslog is spammed with failed usb_disk driver semaphore acquirings). USB flash drives don't even reach the Haiku boot up screen (this is with USB 2.0 and EHCI).

comment:23 by pulkomandy, 5 years ago

Well then, maybe you can build your own customized profile with just the drivers you need.

comment:24 by CodeforEvolution, 4 years ago

Confirmed that this message no longer occurs on hrev53790 running on a 32 bit machine. There are some other issues I'm noticing with workspace switching, different colorspaces, and GLTeapot. Should I open separate issues for these or post them here?

comment:25 by pulkomandy, 4 years ago

For the workspace switching problem, delete the workspaces settings file, or make sure to set a working resolution for "all workspaces" in screen preferences (if the file ended up with broken resolution from previous tests with older revisions, this is needed).

Please open separate issues for the two other problems, I think it will be easier to track.

comment:26 by CodeforEvolution, 4 years ago

Workspace switching was fine, but having a separate color space for each workspace and then switching was partially broken. And will do!

comment:27 by pulkomandy, 4 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: in-progressclosed

I think we can close this ticket and handle the remaining issues separately.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.