Opened 6 hours ago
Last modified 4 hours ago
#19249 new bug
Invalidating a view doesn't invalidate its children
Reported by: | jackburton | Owned by: | axeld |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Unscheduled |
Component: | Servers/app_server | Version: | R1/beta5 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Platform: | All |
Description
Maybe I understood it wrong, but I thought that Invalidating a view would also invalidate its children. About Invalidate(), the bebook says:
"Invalidates the rect portion of the view, causing update messages—and consequently Draw() notifications—to be generated for the BView and all descendants that lie wholly or partially within the rectangle. The rectangle is stated in the BView's coordinate system. "
Here's a test case to show it doesn't. Attached is also a clip of how the test case result should look.
Note that adding B_DRAW_ON_CHILDREN to the view flag "fixes" the issue, but it doesn't feel correct, since the views don't need to draw on their children.
Attachments (2)
Change History (7)
by , 6 hours ago
Attachment: | BViewInvalidate.zip added |
---|
comment:1 by , 5 hours ago
It is expected behavior. Child views are excluded from current view invalidation region if B_TRANSPARENT_BACKGROUND
flag is not specified for child views. Invalidation should cause no effect to child view without B_TRANSPARENT_BACKGROUND
because it will overwrite all parent view contents.
comment:2 by , 5 hours ago
Makes sense in some way, but what if the parent view is just a "container" ? Should I use B_TRANSPARENT_BACKGROUND then ?
comment:3 by , 5 hours ago
Makes sense in some way, but what if the parent view is just a "container" ?
What are you trying to achieve? What is a problem with calling Invalidate to child views?
Invalidate()
call it intended to mark specific view contents that do not match view state and should be repainted later. Calling Invalidate()
on a view that is not changed to repaint child views is an API misuse.
comment:4 by , 4 hours ago
In my case (not the test case), I created a custom BView which, beside doing other things, contains a BOutlineListView (with layout, of course), let's call it ContainerView. Users of ContainerView don't need to know about the inner BOutlineListView, so if they want to trigger invalidation for some reason, they call the ContainerView::Invalidate(). When ContainerView is invalidated it needs to trigger invalidation also for the inner BOutlineView.
comment:5 by , 4 hours ago
so if they want to trigger invalidation for some reason, they call the ContainerView::Invalidate().
Invalidate()
usually shouldn't be called by client. BView itself should call it according to its state changes.
Test case