#525 closed bug (fixed)
[Terminal] slow text selection
Reported by: | diver | Owned by: | jackburton |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | R1 |
Component: | Applications/Terminal | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Platform: | All |
Description (last modified by )
For example try to open some text file and select text with mouse, or try to Alt+a in Terminal with large output.
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:2 by , 19 years ago
comment:4 by , 18 years ago
Component: | General → Applications |
---|---|
Description: | modified (diff) |
Platform: | → All |
Summary: | [BTextView] slow text selection → [Terminal] slow text selection |
This is a Terminal specific problem.
comment:5 by , 18 years ago
Component: | Applications → Applications/Terminal |
---|
Is there any reason why we still use prefixes like "[Terminal]" in the summary instead of just selecting (or adding) the affected component and leaving the summary clean?
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
hrev21524 seems to have fixed the problem. Although we might think about reusing BTextView for Terminal, instead of the own rolled implementation.
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
There are several reasons why the usage of BTextView is inappropriate currently:
- it does not support changing the background color per character
- it has one large text buffer and no hard character-level word wrapping
Of course we could extend BTextView, but I guess keeping the status quo isn't too bad either.
AFAIK Terminal doesn't use BTextView, but you are right, it's slow in StyledEdit for example