Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#15366 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Consider renaming dprintf?
| Reported by: | jessicah | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Unscheduled |
| Component: | System/POSIX | Version: | R1/Development |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Blocked By: | #4929 | Blocking: | |
| Platform: | All |
Description
dprintf is now a part of POSIX.1-2008, so we probably shouldn't overload the use of this function.
Came up from running lgtm.com on the Haiku tree, as POSIX dprintf takes an extra argument.
Given it's mainly exported from KernelExport.h, it could be safe to do a mass rename to something better, even if it is public API. I'm sure we could retain binary compatibility if we keep a forwarding definition but rename the declaration. Thoughts?
LGTM alerts: https://lgtm.com/projects/g/haiku/haiku/alerts
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
| Blocked By: | 4929 added |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → duplicate |
| Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Actually a dup of #4929…