#15366 closed enhancement (duplicate)

Consider renaming dprintf?

Reported by: jessicah Owned by: nobody
Priority: normal Milestone: Unscheduled
Component: System/POSIX Version: R1/Development
Keywords: Cc:
Blocked By: #4929 Blocking:
Platform: All

Description

dprintf is now a part of POSIX.1-2008, so we probably shouldn't overload the use of this function.

Came up from running lgtm.com on the Haiku tree, as POSIX dprintf takes an extra argument.

Given it's mainly exported from KernelExport.h, it could be safe to do a mass rename to something better, even if it is public API. I'm sure we could retain binary compatibility if we keep a forwarding definition but rename the declaration. Thoughts?

LGTM alerts: https://lgtm.com/projects/g/haiku/haiku/alerts

Change History (2)

comment:1 by mmu_man, 11 months ago

Actually a dup of #4929

comment:2 by waddlesplash, 11 months ago

Blocked By: 4929 added
Resolution: duplicate
Status: newclosed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.