Opened 16 years ago
Last modified 16 years ago
#2649 closed bug
Licence name is misleading — at Initial Version
Reported by: | mmu_man | Owned by: | axeld |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Milestone: | R1/alpha1 |
Component: | - General | Version: | R1/pre-alpha1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ben.allen@… | |
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Platform: | All |
Description
The "MIT" licence does not actually exist. It's a nickname to the X11 licence, which is close to the revised BSD one. But the MIT has used many licences over time. Even though it's a known fact and might legally work, naming which we mean is much better. We should choose either X11 or BSD-revised, and use the correct name everywhere. See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#X11License
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.