Opened 18 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#1266 closed bug (fixed)
Unrecognised Partition Table errors
Reported by: | euan | Owned by: | bonefish |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | R1/alpha1 |
Component: | System/Kernel | Version: | R1/pre-alpha1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Platform: | All |
Description
Haiku doesn't seem to see the other partitons (one Ext3, the other fat32) on my disk.
Partition Table: check for partitioning_system: Intel Extended Partition intel: ep_identify_partition(2, 32777740800, 1571028480, 512) check for partitioning_system: Apple Partition Map * scan child 0x001077a8 (start = 34348769280, size = 6820208640, parent = 0x00107440)! Partition::Scan() check for partitioning_system: Amiga Partition Map check for partitioning_system: Intel Partition Map intel: pm_identify_partition(2, 1079208: 34348769280, 6820208640, 512) Partition::SetTo(): active: c3 intel: _ParsePrimary(): partition 0: bad location, ignoring Partition::SetTo(): active: ad intel: _ParsePrimary(): partition 1: bad location, ignoring Partition::SetTo(): active: 69 intel: _ParsePrimary(): partition 2: bad location, ignoring Partition::SetTo(): active: 79 intel: _ParsePrimary(): partition 3: bad location, ignoring check for partitioning_system: Intel Extended Partition intel: ep_identify_partition(2, 34348769280, 6820208640, 512)
Partition Table for /dev/hda (cfdisk in linux) ---Starting--- ----Ending---- Start Number of # Flags Head Sect Cyl ID Head Sect Cyl Sector Sectors -- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----------- ----------- 1 0x80 1 1 0 0x83 254 63 504 63 8112762 2 0x00 254 63 1023 0x0F 254 63 1023 61448625 78445395 3 0x00 254 63 1023 0xEB 254 63 1023 139894020 11100915 4 0x00 0 0 0 0x00 0 0 0 0 0 5 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 63 62926542 6 0x00 254 63 1023 0x82 254 63 1023 63 4096512 7 0x00 254 63 1023 0x0B 254 63 1023 63 11422152 Partition Table for /dev/hda First Last # Type Sector Sector Offset Length Filesystem Type (ID) Flag -- ------- ----------- ----------- ------ ----------- -------------------- ---- 1 Primary 0 8112824 63 8112825 Linux (83) Boot Pri/Log 8112825 61448624 0 53335800 Free Space None 2 Primary 61448625 139894019 0 78445395 W95 Ext'd (LBA) (0F) None 5 Logical 61448625 124375229 63 62926605 Linux (83) None 6 Logical 124375230 128471804 63 4096575 Linux swap / So (82) None 7 Logical 128471805 139894019 63 11422215 W95 FAT32 (0B) None 3 Primary 139894020 150994934 0 11100915 BeOS fs (EB) None Primary 150994935 156296384 0 5301450 Free Space None
Attachments (4)
Change History (16)
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
Sorry, posted linux info from wrong HD, must have been past my bedtime last night...
Disk is 40GB. (41174138880 bytes)
Partition Table for /dev/hda
---Starting--- ----Ending---- Start Number of # Flags Head Sect Cyl ID Head Sect Cyl Sector Sectors -- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----------- ----------- 1 0x80 1 1 0 0xEB 15 63 1023 63 3068352 2 0x00 15 63 1023 0x83 15 63 1023 3068415 60950610 3 0x00 15 63 1023 0x06 15 63 1023 64019025 3068415 4 0x00 0 0 0 0x00 0 0 0 0 0 Partition Table for /dev/hda First Last # Type Sector Sector Offset Length Filesystem Type (ID) Flag -- ------- ----------- ----------- ------ ----------- -------------------- ---- 1 Primary 0 3068414* 63 3068415*BeOS fs (EB) Boot 2 Primary 3068415* 64019024* 0 60950610*Linux (83) None 3 Primary 64019025* 67087439 0 3068415*FAT16 (06) None Pri/Log 67087440 80418239 0 13330800 Free Space None Disk Drive: /dev/hda Sector 0: 0x000: EB 48 90 8E D0 89 C4 EA 60 7D 00 00 0D 54 6F 6F 0x010: 20 6D 61 6E 79 20 72 65 61 64 20 65 72 72 6F 72 0x020: 73 2E 00 0D 42 6F 6F 74 20 4D 61 6E 61 67 65 72 0x030: 20 73 69 67 6E 61 74 75 72 65 20 6E 6F 74 03 02 0x040: FF 00 00 20 01 00 00 00 00 02 FA 90 90 F6 C2 80 0x050: 75 02 B2 80 EA 59 7C 00 00 31 C0 8E D8 8E D0 BC 0x060: 00 20 FB A0 40 7C 3C FF 74 02 88 C2 52 BE 7F 7D 0x070: E8 34 01 F6 C2 80 74 54 B4 41 BB AA 55 CD 13 5A 0x080: 52 72 49 81 FB 55 AA 75 43 A0 41 7C 84 C0 75 05 0x090: 83 E1 01 74 37 66 8B 4C 10 BE 05 7C C6 44 FF 01 0x0A0: 66 8B 1E 44 7C C7 04 10 00 C7 44 02 01 00 66 89 0x0B0: 5C 08 C7 44 06 00 70 66 31 C0 89 44 04 66 89 44 0x0C0: 0C B4 42 CD 13 72 05 BB 00 70 EB 7D B4 08 CD 13 0x0D0: 73 0A F6 C2 80 0F 84 EA 00 E9 8D 00 BE 05 7C C6 0x0E0: 44 FF 00 66 31 C0 88 F0 40 66 89 44 04 31 D2 88 0x0F0: CA C1 E2 02 88 E8 88 F4 40 89 44 08 31 C0 88 D0 0x100: C0 E8 02 66 89 04 66 A1 44 7C 66 31 D2 66 F7 34 0x110: 88 54 0A 66 31 D2 66 F7 74 04 88 54 0B 89 44 0C 0x120: 3B 44 08 7D 3C 8A 54 0D C0 E2 06 8A 4C 0A FE C1 0x130: 08 D1 8A 6C 0C 5A 8A 74 0B BB 00 70 8E C3 31 DB 0x140: B8 01 02 CD 13 72 2A 8C C3 8E 06 48 7C 60 1E B9 0x150: 00 01 8E DB 31 F6 31 FF FC F3 A5 1F 61 FF 26 42 0x160: 7C BE 85 7D E8 40 00 EB 0E BE 8A 7D E8 38 00 EB 0x170: 06 BE 94 7D E8 30 00 BE 99 7D E8 2A 00 EB FE 47 0x180: 52 55 42 20 00 47 65 6F 6D 00 48 61 72 64 20 44 0x190: 69 73 6B 00 52 65 61 64 00 20 45 72 72 6F 72 00 0x1A0: BB 01 00 B4 0E CD 10 AC 3C 00 75 F4 C3 00 00 00 0x1B0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3D 7F 05 00 00 00 80 01 0x1C0: 01 00 EB 0F FF FF 3F 00 00 00 C0 D1 2E 00 00 0F 0x1D0: FF FF 83 0F FF FF FF D1 2E 00 52 08 A2 03 00 0F 0x1E0: FF FF 06 0F FF FF 51 DA D0 03 FF D1 2E 00 00 00 0x1F0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 55 AA
syslog and MBR files attached
comment:3 by , 18 years ago
The partitions are found OK. We don't have any ext2/ext3 file system support ATM; so it's little surprising that you can't mount it. I don't have particular insight regarding the state of the auto-recognition of our DOS FS add-on, but it seems to be implemented at least.
Anyway, please check whether there are partitions entries published in "/dev/disk/atapi/1/slave/". If that is the case, please try to mount the FAT partition manually. If it is not the case, please enable debug output in src/system/kernel/disk_device_manager/jobs/KScanPartitionJob.cpp ("#define DBG(x) x" instead of the definition there).
comment:4 by , 18 years ago
I'm guessing there won't be anything in "/dev/disk/atapi/1/slave/" unless I put a CDROM in the drive. I'll have a look tonight. Thanks for the help, it would speed up my testing 100 fold if I could get a fat partition mountable.
When I look in "/dev/disk/ata/0/master" there is only the Haiku partitions visible. Shouldn't all partitions detected be visible in this folder whether they are mounted or not?
Euan
comment:5 by , 18 years ago
Ah, sorry, I meant /dev/disk/ata/0/master/, if that is your HD. And yeah, all partitions should be published, whether they are recognized or not. Please enable the debug output in KScanPartitionJob.cpp then. And maybe also in src/system/kernel/fs/devfs.cpp.
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
Component: | File Systems → System/Kernel |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
Why you don't see all entries in /dev/disk/ata/0/master/ is a mystery. According to the log, the devfs successfully publishes entries "0", "1", "2", and "3". Since scanning the partitions works, they definitely are published at that time.
Anyway, it is pretty clear why your FAT partition was not mounted. The initial disk device scan happens before the boot partition is mounted (obviously), and since our dosfs is not built into the boot loader, it won't be recognized at that point. Rescanning after the boot partition has been mounted was not implemented until hrev21655 (you tested with hrev21346), but it was broken anyway. It should be fixed in hrev22198, but I couldn't really test yet. Please verify.
comment:8 by , 17 years ago
Looks like I missed to commit something. The revision where should be fixed is hrev22201.
comment:10 by , 17 years ago
Apologies I haven't been able to build haiku for a few weeks on linux due to several hardware changes. Was trying today to fix linux to test sata and this bug, but it didn't get far enough. Gimme a few more days if I don't get back to you later tonight, pretty please. :)
comment:11 by , 17 years ago
Tested with hrev22233
Fat partition is now mountable, but attempting to write to it ended in error due to the write_bad_block problem that is subsequently fixed in recent commits. I can't update as SVN appears to be down. So it appears to be fixed. Syslog attached (fatTest.log)
comment:12 by , 17 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Thanks for the update. I close this ticket then. If the FAT FS problem persists with a current revision, please open a new ticket.
Can you please provide a full syslog; the part you provided is saying very little. Also appreciated would be hex dump of the disk's first block.